Our public test set is a file we no longer change. Each customer file was written for the typology it illustrates, a named pattern of risk, or generated from those files under a seed. It holds no customer data, anonymised or otherwise.
No official risk list was copied in either. A test requires the suspect files and the retained ones, those not escalated, to share their countries. So the test set cannot bring a list in by its examples. The geography factor, which reads the country, is zero here, and the tool prints that zero as a finding.
Check the data's sourceThe data file states its source, and a test checks that no official list was copied in.
run it yourself
python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('src/dossiers-etiquetes.json')); print(d['provenance'], len(d['dossiers']), 'dossiers, each with a written reason')"prints: authored 84 dossiers, each with a written reason (source, then customer files)
Where it livessrc/dossiers-etiquetes.json:2 · src/dossiers-etiquetes.test.ts:65